ReviewBlood advances2025
CHIP away at the marrow-clot connection: inflammation, clonal hematopoiesis, and thromboembolic disease.
Review in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunothrombotic Cell-Cell Communication Networks in Coronary Atherosclerosis: Critical Insights from Single-Cell and Spatial Systems Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Inflammatory cytokines, inflammasomes, and neutrophil extracellular traps in primary immune thrombocytopenia pathogenesis.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Review
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and cardiovascular disease: mechanistic insights, clinical implications, and the dawn of precision cardio-hematology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis and Cardiovascular Risk in ESKD-New Insights from the VIVALDI Study.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBoth the incidence and prognosis of arterial atherothrombosis and venous thromboembolism are strongly correlated with increasing age. Over the past decade, clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) has been identified as a novel biomarker for cardiovascular disease. Driven by somatic mutations in the hematopoietic system, the epidemiology of CHIP is highly age dependent: among individuals aged ≥70 years in the general population, estimated prevalence of CHIP exceeds 10%. Several additional risk factors for CHIP have emerged in recent years, including smoking, receipt of anticancer therapy, and germ line predispositions. CHIP carriers consistently have higher risk of incident arterial atherothrombosis, even after accounting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. However, the magnitude of this association varies across studies. In addition, individuals with established cardiovascular disease and CHIP have higher risks of recurrence and all-cause mortality than their non-CHIP counterparts. An association between CHIP carriership and incident venous thromboembolism has recently been made, although additional studies are needed to confirm this finding. No approved therapy exists to modify the cardiovascular risk among CHIP carriers. However, canakinumab showed promise in a post-hoc analyses of patients with TET2-mutated CHIP, and other anti-inflammasome agents are actively under development or evaluation. In this review, we provide an overview of CHIP as a mediator of thromboembolic diseases and discuss emerging therapeutics aimed at intervening on this thrombo-inflammatory nexus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.