ArticleBlood advances2025
Role of molecular alterations in transplantation decisions for patients with primary myelofibrosis.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the modern era: Single-center outcomes with DIPSS risk stratification.Blood research · 2026Article
- Outcomes of allogeneic transplantation in blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: one-third achieve long-term survival.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score predicts allo-HCT outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Impact of Donor Type on Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: A Study on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- The number of additional high molecular risk mutations predicts outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary and secondary myelofibrosis.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Challenging Scenarios in the Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025Review
- Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Myelofibrosis and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Contemporary Review.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- It's More Than Complex: Further Insights Into TP53 in MPN.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe aim of our study was to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) according to clinicobiological scores, which incorporate mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system (MIPSS) to facilitate decision-making in this context. One transplant (n = 241) and 1 nontransplant cohort (n = 239) were used to test the hypothesis that patients with primary myelofibrosis with higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. A weighted propensity score was applied to balance confounding factors with the transplanted cohort as reference. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analyses were performed. Overall, 105 patients who did not receive transplant could be matched to the 239 patients who did receive transplants. HSCT was associated with a higher 6-year overall survival rate in intermediate-2 (60.1% vs 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS patients (44.4% vs 6.55%), high-risk MIPSS70 (46.5% vs 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% vs 39.7%) or very high-risk MIPSS70+V2 (51.8% vs 24%). Patients with intermediate MIPSS70 scores have an advantage of survival with HSCT only when their myelofibrosis transplant scoring system (MTSS) were low or intermediate. Patients who received transplant had an increased mortality risk the first year, but a significant benefit with HSCT after the 1-year landmark was observed in higher risk patients. This study confirms that, similar to DIPSS, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk score in addition to MTSS can be used to determine which patients with primary myelofibrosis have survival benefit from HSCT over non-HSCT strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.