Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39561305›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Classifying Tumor Reportability Status From Unstructured Electronic Pathology Reports Using Language Models in a Population-Based Cancer Registry Setting.

Lovedeep Gondara, Jonathan Simkin, Gregory Arbour, Shebnum Devji, Raymond Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lovedeep GondaraBritish Columbia Cancer Registry, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-9672
Jonathan SimkinBritish Columbia Cancer Registry, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6184-6024
Gregory ArbourData Science Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-7323-4701
Shebnum DevjiBritish Columbia Cancer Registry, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, Canada.
Raymond NgData Science Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePopulation-based cancer registries (PBCRs) collect data on all new cancer diagnoses in a defined population. Data are sourced from pathology reports, and the PBCRs rely on manual and rule-based solutions. This study presents a state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) pipeline, built by fine-tuning pretrained language models (LMs). The pipeline is deployed at the British Columbia Cancer Registry (BCCR) to detect reportable tumors from a population-based feed of electronic pathology.

methodsWe fine-tune two publicly available LMs, GatorTron and BlueBERT, which are pretrained on clinical text. Fine-tuning is done using BCCR's pathology reports. For the final decision making, we combine both models' output using an OR approach. The fine-tuning data set consisted of 40,000 reports from the diagnosis year of 2021, and the test data sets consisted of 10,000 reports from the diagnosis year 2021, 20,000 reports from diagnosis year 2022, and 400 reports from diagnosis year 2023.

resultsThe retrospective evaluation of our proposed approach showed boosted reportable accuracy, maintaining the true reportable threshold of 98%.

conclusionDisadvantages of rule-based NLP in cancer surveillance include manual effort in rule design and sensitivity to language change. Deep learning approaches demonstrate superior performance in classification. PBCRs distinguish reportability status of incoming electronic cancer pathology reports. Deep learning methods provide significant advantages over rule-based NLP.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingNeoplasmsRegistriesBritish ColumbiaElectronic Health RecordsHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39561305
PMCPMC11593994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.