Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39561120›Full record

ReviewPLOS digital health2024

Large language models in medicine: A review of current clinical trials across healthcare applications.

Mahmud Omar, Girish N Nadkarni, Eyal Klang, Benjamin S Glicksberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Beyond one-size-fits-all: mapping information-seeking and decision-making pathways in cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahmud OmarMaccabi Health Services, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0438-0827
Girish N NadkarniThe Division of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine (D3M), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States of America.
Eyal KlangThe Division of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine (D3M), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States of America.
Benjamin S GlicksbergThe Division of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine (D3M), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review analyzes current clinical trials investigating large language models' (LLMs) applications in healthcare. We identified 27 trials (5 published and 22 ongoing) across 4 main clinical applications: patient care, data handling, decision support, and research assistance. Our analysis reveals diverse LLM uses, from clinical documentation to medical decision-making. Published trials show promise but highlight accuracy concerns. Ongoing studies explore novel applications like patient education and informed consent. Most trials occur in the United States of America and China. We discuss the challenges of evaluating rapidly evolving LLMs through clinical trials and identify gaps in current research. This review aims to inform future studies and guide the integration of LLMs into clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID39561120
PMCPMC11575759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.