Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39560942›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2024

Response Trajectories and Temporal Trends of Viloxazine Treatment for Young People With ADHD: A Meta-Analysis.

Chia-Ling Yu, Yu-Chen Kao, Trevor Thompson, Brendon Stubbs, Ping-Tao Tseng, Chih-Wei Hsu, Fu-Chi Yang, Yu-Kang Tu, Tien-Wei Hsu, Chih-Sung Liang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chia-Ling YuDepartment of Pharmacy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yu-Chen KaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Trevor ThompsonCentre for Chronic Illness and Ageing, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom.
Brendon StubbsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ping-Tao TsengInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chih-Wei HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Fu-Chi YangDepartment of Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Kang TuInstitute of Health Data Analytics & Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tien-Wei HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, E-Da Dachang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chih-Sung LiangDepartment of Psychiatry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Viloxazine is a novel nonstimulant medication approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Objectives: To investigate the whether viloxazine is associated with effective and acceptable outcomes when treating children and adolescents with ADHD and to evaluate these outcomes' associations with viloxazine doses and duration of treatment. Data Sources: The MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were searched from database inception to June 23, 2024. Study Selection: Two reviewers independently screened for double-blind, fixed-dose randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared viloxazine with placebo for pediatric patients with ADHD. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. Data extraction was completed independently by 2 authors and cross-checked for errors. Random-effects pairwise and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the improvement of ADHD symptoms (measured by ADHD Rating Scale-5), and the secondary outcomes were all-cause discontinuation, dropout due to adverse effects, and serious adverse effects. Results: A total of 5 dose-response RCTs were included, with 1560 participants (1011 [64.8%] male; mean [SD] age, 10.6 [6.7] years). Viloxazine was associated with better outcomes in ADHD treatment compared with placebo (mean difference, 5.47 points; 95% CI, 4.03-6.91 points). The dose-response curve was bell-shaped, suggesting that doses greater than 400 mg or greater than 7 mg/kg might not be associated with more efficacy. The temporal trends analysis showed ascent curves tapering off at approximately weeks 4 to 6. The curve for 100 mg/d declined more rapidly, while the curves for 200 mg/d and 400 mg/d declined more gradually. The overall discontinuation rate due to adverse effects was 4.15% in the viloxazine group (45 of 1084), while viloxazine compared with placebo was associated with 2.48-fold higher risk of discontinuation due to adverse effects (risk ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.26-4.88). Conclusions and relevance: In this meta-analysis, viloxazine was associated with better efficacy in treating children and adolescents with ADHD than placebo. A moderate dose (200-400 mg or 6-8 mg/kg) may provide optimal treatment outcomes. Future studies are warranted to assess the long-term effect of viloxazine. Viloxazine was relatively well tolerated for children and adolescents with ADHD.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityViloxazineAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeViloxazine

Identifiers

PMID39560942
PMCPMC11577144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.