Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39560937›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2024

Leveraging Open-Source Large Language Models for Data Augmentation in Hospital Staff Surveys: Mixed Methods Study.

Carl Ehrett, Sudeep Hegde, Kwame Andre, Dixizi Liu, Timothy Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carl Ehrett *Watt Family Innovation Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0711-0347
Sudeep Hegde *Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9711-8459
Kwame Andre *Department of Computer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-9037-7428
Dixizi Liu *Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-2422-5463
Timothy Wilson *Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1711-6367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Generative large language models (LLMs) have the potential to revolutionize medical education by generating tailored learning materials, enhancing teaching efficiency, and improving learner engagement. However, the application of LLMs in health care settings, particularly for augmenting small datasets in text classification tasks, remains underexplored, particularly for cost- and privacy-conscious applications that do not permit the use of third-party services such as OpenAI's ChatGPT. Objective: This study aims to explore the use of open-source LLMs, such as Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA) and Alpaca models, for data augmentation in a specific text classification task related to hospital staff surveys. Methods: The surveys were designed to elicit narratives of everyday adaptation by frontline radiology staff during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. A 2-step process of data augmentation and text classification was conducted. The study generated synthetic data similar to the survey reports using 4 generative LLMs for data augmentation. A different set of 3 classifier LLMs was then used to classify the augmented text for thematic categories. The study evaluated performance on the classification task. Results: The overall best-performing combination of LLMs, temperature, classifier, and number of synthetic data cases is via augmentation with LLaMA 7B at temperature 0.7 with 100 augments, using Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (RoBERTa) for the classification task, achieving an average area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.87 (SD 0.02; ie, 1 SD). The results demonstrate that open-source LLMs can enhance text classifiers' performance for small datasets in health care contexts, providing promising pathways for improving medical education processes and patient care practices. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the value of data augmentation with open-source LLMs, highlights the importance of privacy and ethical considerations when using LLMs, and suggests future directions for research in this field.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPersonnel, HospitalSurveys and QuestionnairesAIartificial intelligencedata augmentationdata privacydata securityethicslarge language modelsmedical educationmedical staffnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID39560937
PMCPMC11590755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.