ArticleHead and neck pathology2024
An Institutional Experience of Core Needle Biopsy with Cooperative Implementation by Pathologists and Head and Neck Oncologists in Salivary Gland Carcinoma.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- SOX10 Expression in Primary Salivary Gland Tumors: A Meta-Analysis.Head and neck pathology · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in Targeted and Systemic Therapy for Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Current Options and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA major problem in establishing treatment strategies for salivary gland carcinomas is the difficulty of preoperative histologic subtyping. Core needle biopsy (CNB) allows the collection of a small, intact specimens from the tumor center for detailed analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and limitations of preoperative diagnosis with CNB specimens collected using a newly developed 20-gauge needle designed to popularize its use.
methodsPaired preoperative CNB and surgical specimens from 41 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A histologic typing platform, including morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation and fluorescence in situ hybridization, was evaluated using CNB specimens. Biopsy specimen quality, diagnostic accuracy, and immunohistochemistry concordance rates between biopsy and surgical specimens were analyzed.
resultsIn 39 of the 41 patients, CNB provided high-quality specimens, enabling adequate morphologic, immunohistologic, and genomic analyses. In two patients, high-quality CNB specimens could not be obtained due to cystic fluid and tumor firmness. The overall accuracy of correct preoperative diagnosis was 75%. The success rate of histologic subtyping and HER2 immunostaining concordance between CNB and surgical specimens was lower in carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) than in de novo carcinoma (histologic subtyping; CXPA vs de novo carcinoma 50% vs 89%, p = 0.016, HER2 concordance; salivary duct carcinoma [SDC] ex-PA vs de novo SDC 16% vs 100%, p = 4.66E-03). No recurrence occurred due to tumor seeding after CNB.
conclusionsHighly accurate histologic subtyping of salivary gland carcinomas can be performed by preoperative CNB; however, specificity can be more challenging in pathologically heterogenous tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.