ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Variation in Cost Centers Following Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Tale of Two Pathways: Same-Surgeon Versus Different-Surgeon Resection After Second Surgical Opinion.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Private equity acquisitions of hospitals and the changing landscape of care for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative low Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index increases intensive care unit admission risk in patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Variation in Cost Centers Following Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite cost-standardization efforts, significant variations in hospital costs persist in insurance claims. We sought to identify and quantify factors driving cost variability at hospital and cost center levels following a complex gastrointestinal surgical procedure.
methodsIndividuals who underwent pancreatectomy (PA), colectomy (CO), and proctectomy (PR) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Index surgery costs across 1,262 hospitals were compared, adjusting for clinical, demographic, and geographic factors. Multilevel regression modeling identified factors associated with variability in charges.
resultsAmong 35,908 individuals (PA: 8.2%; CO: 79.4%; PR: 12.4%), the median age was 78 years (interquartile range [IQR] 72-84), with 56.1% male. Median Medicare payments varied significantly by cancer type (CO: $21,704, PA: $26,709, PR: $21,228; p < 0.001). Operating room ($6,891, 23.82%), hospital stay ($5,931, 20.9%), and professional fees ($4,352, 15.35%) were the top cost centers, comprising 60% of total costs. Surgeons had the highest charges (PA: $2,037; CO: $2,131; PR: $2,243), followed by anesthesiologists (PA: $622; CO: $431; PR: $480). Charges for critical care specialists and pathologists were relatively low. Multilevel modeling demonstrated total charge variability was primarily influenced by patient factors (83%), followed by surgeon factors (9%) and hospital factors (8%).
conclusionsThere was marked variation in spending at the cost center level in the surgical treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. Patient factors demonstrated the greatest variability, followed by hospital and surgeon-level factors. Implementing value-based healthcare and standardized surgical protocols may improve both care quality and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39560829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.