ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2024
Follow-up by telephone questionnaire in outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telemedicine and Digital Tools in Dentistry: Enhancing Diagnosis and Remote Patient Care.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe SARS-CoV2 pandemic introduced a new problem in postoperative outpatient care: If I set a follow-up appointment at the clinic, will I endanger my patient? This study presents a different way to identify problems in the postoperative setting after outpatient procedures in our field- the telephone interview.
methodsA study nurse conducted the telephone interview using a structured questionnaire within one week of minor outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery. She asked about pain, swelling, numbness, and mouth opening limitations. Certain red flag answers (numbness, increasing pain, increasing swelling, pain keeping patient from sleeping, pain on swallowing) caused her to book an appointment for the patient in our clinic within the following 24 hours.
results52 Patients completed the telephone questionnaire. Of those 3 (5.7%) had red flag answers that resulted in an appointment at the hospital within 24 hours. 2 (3.8%) of them were due to numbness. 24 (46.2%) patients reported no pain. On the numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), the average reported pain was 2.24 (SE 0.30). Swelling was reported by 39 (75%) patients. 22 (42.3%) reported the swelling to be mild, 10 (19.2%) moderate, and 7 (13.5%) to be severe. 13 (25%) patients reported a limitation to mouth opening. None reported the interincisal distance to be smaller than one finger.
conclusionA structured telephone questionnaire can be a useful tool to discern postoperative complications and initiate necessary treatment. At the same time, it minimizes overtreatment. It can be used as a standard tool in the ambulatory treatment. It can be delegated to a secretary or ambulatory nurse with a standardized questionnaire to optimize resource use for selected patients. Moreover, patients describe it as a service to be called at home and they avoid unnecessary travel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39560774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.