ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
Reappraising the prognostic relevance of cytogenetic risk in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful allogeneic stem cell transplant in a patient with a left ventricular assist device: a novel case report.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors for allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes in primary refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (2013-2022): A retrospective study by the adult acute myeloid leukaemia working group of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Cytogenetic Abnormalities and Their Impact on Acute Myeloid Leukemia Outcomes Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the prognostic relevance of cytogenetic risk in 9826 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during the first or second complete remission. The 5-year probabilities of overall survival (OS) were 66%, 61%, and 47% (P < 0.001), the cumulative incidences of relapse were 14%, 19%, and 32% (P < 0.001), and the cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 23%, 23%, and 25% (P = 0.208) in patients with favorable (n = 1418), intermediate (n = 6747), and poor cytogenetic risk (n = 1661), respectively. The significant effect of cytogenetic risk on OS was strong in all subgroups stratified by age, sex, performance status, disease status, donor type, conditioning intensity, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and transplantation period (P < 0.001 for all). The evaluation of trends in posttransplant outcomes for patients in each cytogenetic risk category indicated that the risk of relapse declined in patients with favorable and intermediate cytogenetics and that the risk of NRM decreased in those with intermediate and poor cytogenetics. Therefore, patients with intermediate cytogenetics experienced the best OS improvement. These results confirm cytogenetic risk as a universal prognostic factor in patients with AML undergoing allogeneic HCT while highlighting the requirement for further improvements in posttransplant OS by reducing NRM in patients with favorable cytogenetics and by reducing relapse in patients with poor cytogenetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39560740What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.