ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2024
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of lumbar stiffness disability index.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Post-lumbar fusion surgery often restricts daily activities due to lumbar stiffness. The validity and reliability of the lumbar stiffness disability index (LSDI) in Türkiye, which measures the impact of lumbar stiffness on functional abilities, have not yet been confirmed. This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of LSDI (Tr-LSDI). Methods: Sixty-six patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery were included in this methodological study. The Tr-LSDI was developed using a forward-backward translation. Using the Davis technique and expert feedback, we confirmed the content validity (CV) of the Tr-LSDI. The construct validity of the Tr-LSDI was assessed with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and convergent validity. Convergent validity was examined by correlation analysis between Tr-LSDI, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and the number of fusion levels. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and test-retest reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Expert evaluation yielded CV indexes > 0.8 for all items. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a one-factor structure for Tr-LSDI, comprising 10 items that accounted for 63.7% of the variance. Factor loadings spanned from 0.371 to 0.926. Notably, the Tr-LSDI score correlated with fusion levels (r=0.386, P=.001) and demonstrated a robust correlation with ODI (r=0.899, P < .001), affirming its convergent validity. The Tr-LSDI displayed excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.934. The ICC was 0.980. Conclusion: The Tr-LSDI is a validated, reliable tool for measuring lumbar stiffness in Türkiye. Its consistency, validity, and alignment with the original LSDI make it suitable for clinical and research use. Level of Evidence: Level II, Diagnostic Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.