Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39560704›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2025

Diversity of cultivable endophytic fungi in a decumbent subshrub endemic of the Brazilian tropical savanna.

Jefferson Brendon Almeida Dos Reis, Jadson Diogo Pereira Bezerra, Helson Mario Martins do Vale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jefferson Brendon Almeida Dos ReisUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Institute of Biological Sciences, Department of Phytopathology, Brasília, DF, Brazil. jeffersonalmeidareis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2768-214X
Jadson Diogo Pereira BezerraUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública (IPTSP), Laboratório de Micologia (LabMicol), Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7782-8602
Helson Mario Martins do ValeUniversity of Brasília (UnB), Institute of Biological Sciences, Department of Phytopathology, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5452-3873

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF) SEI 00193.00000229/2021-21Universidade de Brasília DPG Nº 010/2023.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of cultivable endophytic fungi in native subshrubs of the Brazilian Cerrado is largely unknown. This study investigated the cultivable endophytic mycobiome of stems, leaves, and flowers of Peltaea polymorpha (Malvaceae). In total, 208 endophytic fungi were isolated, 95 from stems, 65 from leaves, and 48 from flowers. The isolates were classified as ascomycetes belonging to three classes, eight orders, ten families, 12 genera, and 31 species. Diaporthe, Nigrospora, and Colletotrichum were the dominant genera in the three analyzed organs. The richness estimators suggested that the number of species might be slightly higher than observed. The highest values for the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices were observed in stems. Beta diversity showed overlapping of fungal communities in different organs, with a high rate of sharing of taxa. Furthermore, the dominant primary fungal lifestyles were plant pathogens and saprobes. Our findings show that the cultivable endophytic fungal community of P. polymorpha is species-rich and that communities in different organs share genera and species.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEndophytesFungiAscomycotaBrazilFlowersGrasslandMycobiomePhylogenyPlant LeavesPlant StemsTropical ClimateCerradoColletotrichumDiaportheFunctional guildsPeltaea polymorpha

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.