Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39560660›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Running modulates primate and rodent visual cortex differently.

John P Liska, Declan P Rowley, Trevor Thai Kim Nguyen, Jens-Oliver Muthmann, Daniel A Butts, Jacob Yates, Alexander C Huk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Active gaze behavior organizes V1 activity in freely-moving marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John P Liska *Departments of Neuroscience and Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.
Declan P Rowley *Departments of Neuroscience and Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.
Trevor Thai Kim NguyenDepartments of Neuroscience and Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3277-9535
Jens-Oliver MuthmannDepartments of Neuroscience and Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0439-9704
Daniel A ButtsDepartment of Biology and Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-5317
Jacob Yates *Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8322-5982
Alexander C Huk *Departments of Neuroscience and Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1430-6935

Funding

Neural circuit computations for visual motion during natural primate behaviorsUF1NS116377 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CAUWENBERGHS, GERT, CORMACK, LAWRENCE KEVIN · 2020 to 2020
$3.3M
Neural mechanisms of active vision in the foveaK99EY032179 · NEI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI YATES, JACOB L · 2021 to 2022
$224k
Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-19-1-0357National Science Foundation NSC-FO 2123605NEI NIH HHS K99 EY032179NIH HHS BRAIN Initiative U01-UF1NS116377NIH HHS K99EY032179-02NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS116377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When mice run, activity in their primary visual cortex (V1) is strongly modulated. This observation has altered conceptions of a brain region assumed to be a passive image processor. Extensive work has followed to dissect the circuits and functions of running-correlated modulation. However, it remains unclear whether visual processing in primates might similarly change during locomotion. We therefore measured V1 activity in marmosets while they viewed stimuli on a treadmill. In contrast to mouse, running-correlated modulations of marmoset V1 were small and tended to be slightly suppressive. Population-level analyses revealed trial-to-trial fluctuations of shared gain across V1 in both species, but while strongly correlated with running in mice, gain modulations were smaller and more often negatively correlated with running in marmosets. Thus, population-wide fluctuations of V1 may reflect a common feature of mammalian visual cortical function, but important quantitative differences point to distinct consequences for the relation between vision and action in primates versus rodents.

Indexed as

CallithrixRunningVisual CortexAnimalsMaleMicePhotic StimulationPrimary Visual CortexVisual PerceptionCallithrix jacchuscomparativemouseneurosciencerunningV1

Identifiers

PMID39560660
PMCPMC11575896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.