ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2025
Making Community-Based Palliative Care Eligibility Determinations: Palliative Care Team Member Perspectives on Access to Information and Algorithm Use.
Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hospice Care in the Era of AI: Hospices' Views on Data-Driven Tools to Support Live Discharge Decisions.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Clinician-identified health characteristics and palliative care eligibility: is dementia overlooked?The American journal of managed care · 2025Article
- Adding Functional Ability Measures to a Mortality Algorithm to Support Palliative Care Eligibility Decisions.Research in gerontological nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeriously ill older adults have high risk of mortality, symptom burden, and compromised functional status, and may benefit from community-based palliative care ("palliative care"). However, identifying potentially eligible individuals is challenging.
objectivesIdentify how a palliative care team makes eligibility determinations, including the use of a mortality risk algorithm.
designSemi-structured focus groups were conducted with palliative care providers to understand how health information is used to assess Medicare Advantage plan patients' eligibility for palliative care. Transcripts were analyzed to identify categories related to how participants used health information in making eligibility determinations. SETTING/
participantsAll outreach and care management team members and nurse practitioners (n = 7) working for a palliative care program at a not-for-profit health care agency.
resultsThe palliative care team used information on symptoms, diagnoses, and acute care utilization when making eligibility determinations. The algorithm generated lists of potentially eligible patients but was deemed not useful because it provided limited information about current health status and was not well integrated into existing health record systems. Participants would like information to be current, detailed, and presented in one location.
conclusionsPalliative care team members used a variety of indicators of unmet care needs to make eligibility determinations. A mortality risk algorithm to identify potentially eligible patients was insufficiently detailed to be useful in final eligibility determinations. These findings provide insights into how health data can be presented to better integrate health information from mortality risk algorithms into existing workflows to support palliative care eligibility decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.