ArticleGenetics2024
Bayesian hierarchical hypothesis testing in large-scale genome-wide association analysis.
Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fast analysis of biobank-size data and meta-analysis using the BGLR R-package.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Pooled it
- Genome-wide fine-mapping improves identification of causal variants.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variable selection and large-scale hypothesis testing are techniques commonly used to analyze high-dimensional genomic data. Despite recent advances in theory and methodology, variable selection and inference with highly collinear features remain challenging. For instance, collinearity poses a great challenge in genome-wide association studies involving millions of variants, many of which may be in high linkage disequilibrium. In such settings, collinearity can significantly reduce the power of variable selection methods to identify individual variants associated with an outcome. To address such challenges, we developed a Bayesian hierarchical hypothesis testing (BHHT)-a novel multiresolution testing procedure that offers high power with adequate error control and fine-mapping resolution. We demonstrate through simulations that the proposed methodology has a power-FDR performance that is competitive with (and in many scenarios better than) state-of-the-art methods. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of using BHHT with large sample size (n∼ 300,000) and ultra dimensional genotypes (∼ 15 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs) by applying it to eight complex traits using data from the UK-Biobank. Our results show that the proposed methodology leads to many more discoveries than those obtained using traditional SNP-centered inference procedures. The article is accompanied by open-source software that implements the methods described in this study using algorithms that scale to biobank-size ultra-high-dimensional data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.