Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39560328›Full record

ArticleJournal of osteopathic medicine2024

Preference signaling in orthopaedic surgery: applicant perspectives and opinions.

Conner Howard, Victor H Martinez, Griffin Hughes, Aroob Zaheer, Christian Allen, Chad Hanson, Brent Norris, Jake X Checketts

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of osteopathic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Conner HowardOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9672-3403
Victor H MartinezSchool of Osteopathic Medicine, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Griffin HughesCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Aroob ZaheerSchool of Osteopathic Medicine, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Christian AllenSchool of Osteopathic Medicine, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Chad HansonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Brent NorrisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Francis Health System, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Jake X CheckettsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextOrthopaedic surgery has become increasingly competitive over the years, with the COVID-19 pandemic creating additional challenges for applicants and programs. To promote an equitable match experience, the American Orthopaedic Association (AOA) introduced a formal preference signaling (PS) system into the 2022-2023 application cycle. PS allows applicants to indicate their heightened interest in specific programs, which improves the likelihood of receiving an interview and ultimately matching at their desired residency program.

objectivesThe objective of this anonymous survey is to assess applicants' opinions and perspectives toward PS in orthopaedic surgery prior to the 2022-2023 match results. Additionally, we sought to evaluate the signaling strategies being utilized by applicants.

methodsAn anonymous 22-question survey was distributed to applicants of an orthopaedic surgery residency program (34.2 % response rate). Responses were collected after the application submission deadline but before the match lists and results were available. This survey included questions germane to demographics, signal utilization, signaling reasons and strategies, and opinions toward PS. Descriptive statistics were calculated utilizing R (version 4.2.1) and RStudio.

resultsMost respondents (96.1 %) participated in PS, and 96.7 % utilized all 30 signals. Signaling encouraged 24.2 % of applicants to apply to fewer programs. In accordance with guidelines, 83.2 % of respondents signaled each away rotation program; however, only 53 % signaled their home program. Applicants commonly signaled 1-10 "reach" and "safety" programs each.

conclusionsDuring the inaugural introduction of PS in orthopaedic surgery, nearly every applicant utilized all 30 signals, prioritizing factors like family proximity and perceived operative experience over program prestige. This shift reflects the importance of geographic location and presumed training quality. Despite unfamiliarity toward PS, personalized signaling strategies were implemented, accompanied by a slight decrease in application volumes. The 30 allotted signals in orthopaedic surgery may serve as an informal application cap due to the necessity of signaling a program for an interview invite. However, improved educational efforts are needed to enhance the understanding and maximize the benefits of PS for both applicants and programs.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyAdultFemaleHumansMaleOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsPersonnel SelectionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesmedical educationmedical studentsprogram signalresidency applicationresidency interviewsthe match

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.