ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Prevalence of Molecular Diagnoses for Usher Syndrome and the Need for Coordinated Care.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Genomic Analysis of Usher Syndrome: Population-Scale Prevalence and Therapeutic Targets.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2025Article
- Usher Syndrome: New Insights into Classification, Genotype-Phenotype Correlation, and Management.Genes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUsher syndrome (USH) is a rare, autosomal-recessive genetic disorder and a leading cause of early onset deaf-blindness. A clinical diagnosis is made by the presence of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Subtype (USH1, USH2, USH3) is determined by severity and age of onset. Molecular testing is able to further distinguish USH subtypes by causative gene. As gene therapy strategies continue to be explored for USH, it is important to know the underlying genetic cause and to coordinate care among an interdisciplinary team.
methodsWe reviewed charts of 198 individuals presenting to the RP clinic at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI) for suspected USH. Demographic information, USH clinical diagnosis, molecular testing, molecular diagnosis, and audiological data were collected.
resultsOf the 198 patients reviewed, 190 (96%) met clinical criteria for USH and received a clinical diagnosis. There were 67 (35%) that had a genetic test with a pathogenic molecular diagnosis. The average ages at molecular diagnosis were USH1B, 20 years old; USH2A, 37 years old; USH2C, 50 years old. Of the 67 with a molecular diagnosis, 23 (34%) established ophthalmic care and 8 of these (11%) established audiological care. DISCUSSION/
conclusionMolecular testing and diagnosis should be part of the routine care of USH individuals to facilitate earlier interventions and coordinated care between ophthalmology and audiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 135:1777-1780, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.