ArticleCancer medicine2024
A Combinatorial Functional Precision Medicine Platform for Rapid Therapeutic Response Prediction in AML.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer-aided drug design in acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review of advances, challenges, and future prospect.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- The interaction between common genetic mutations in AML and the immune landscape: mechanisms and implications for immune response.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite advances made in targeted biomarker-based therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment, remission is often short and followed by relapse and acquired resistance. Functional precision medicine (FPM) efforts have been shown to improve therapy selection guidance by incorporating comprehensive biological data to tailor individual treatment. However, effectively managing complex biological data, while also ensuring rapid conversion of actionable insights into clinical utility remains challenging.
methodsWe have evaluated the clinical applicability of quadratic phenotypic optimization platform (QPOP), to predict clinical response to combination therapies in AML and reveal patient-centric insights into combination therapy sensitivities. In this prospective study, 51 primary samples from newly diagnosed (ND) or refractory/relapsed (R/R) AML patients were evaluated by QPOP following ex vivo drug testing.
resultsIndividualized drug sensitivity reports were generated in 55/63 (87.3%) patient samples with a median turnaround time of 5 (4-10) days from sample collection to report generation. To evaluate clinical feasibility, QPOP-predicted response was compared to clinical treatment outcomes and indicated concordant results with 83.3% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity and an overall 86.2% accuracy. Serial QPOP analysis in a FLT3-mutant patient sample indicated decreased FLT3 inhibitor (FLT3i) sensitivity, which is concordant with increasing FLT3 allelic burden and drug resistance development. Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1)-AKT signaling was subsequently identified to contribute to resistance to FLT3i.
conclusionOverall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of applying QPOP as a functional combinatorial precision medicine platform to predict therapeutic sensitivities in AML and provides the basis for prospective clinical trials evaluating ex vivo-guided combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.