Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39560203›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2024

Development of a Tagmentation-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay as an Alternative to Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Sequencing.

Wei Cheng David Kuek, Chean Nee Chai, Wei Ming Jason Tham, Alvin Yu Jin Ng, Dilys Shi Ning Lau, Janice Yen Qi Loo, Dan Thu Van, Joanna Kia Min Tan, Chun Kiat Lee, Benedict Yan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wei Cheng David KuekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5992-6312
Chean Nee ChaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3947-2092
Wei Ming Jason ThamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-2314
Alvin Yu Jin NgDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1744-6063
Dilys Shi Ning LauDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9877-9274
Janice Yen Qi LooDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8981-436X
Dan Thu VanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2274-0153
Joanna Kia Min TanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0814-2256
Chun Kiat LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-0000
Benedict YanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-8442
Tim Hon Man ChanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Molecular Diagnosis Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8179-5439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) technology enables sample multiplexing for interrogation of multiple regions of interest (ROI). Leveraging this, together with access to affordable NGS platforms, we explored the practicality of moving capillary electrophoresis (CE), noncapillary electrophoresis and single-gene testing to NGS. In this work, we evaluated the iSeq 100's capacity to validate 89 samples at once.

methodsGenomic DNA was extracted from 89 archival samples of varying specimen types. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done with in house primers, library preparation with the Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit and cleaning up with paramagnetic beads. The sequencing was performed on one Illumina iSeq 100 flow cell.

resultsWith our workflow, 88 out of 89 samples were accurately sequenced with variant alleles identified. One sample of the 88 samples was initially discordant because the primers used were in a heterozygous deletion region. Upon redesigning of primers, the sample proved concordant.

conclusionsThe iSeq-Nextera workflow proved accurate. However, variant allele frequencys generated by the Nextera are not precise.

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, CapillaryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNAiSeq 100Nextera XTnext‐generation sequencingvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39560203
PMCPMC11574739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.