ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2024
Development of a Tagmentation-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay as an Alternative to Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Sequencing.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) technology enables sample multiplexing for interrogation of multiple regions of interest (ROI). Leveraging this, together with access to affordable NGS platforms, we explored the practicality of moving capillary electrophoresis (CE), noncapillary electrophoresis and single-gene testing to NGS. In this work, we evaluated the iSeq 100's capacity to validate 89 samples at once.
methodsGenomic DNA was extracted from 89 archival samples of varying specimen types. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done with in house primers, library preparation with the Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit and cleaning up with paramagnetic beads. The sequencing was performed on one Illumina iSeq 100 flow cell.
resultsWith our workflow, 88 out of 89 samples were accurately sequenced with variant alleles identified. One sample of the 88 samples was initially discordant because the primers used were in a heterozygous deletion region. Upon redesigning of primers, the sample proved concordant.
conclusionsThe iSeq-Nextera workflow proved accurate. However, variant allele frequencys generated by the Nextera are not precise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.