Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39560115›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2025

How Specialized Are Special Needs Plans? Evidence From Provider Networks.

Grace McCormack, Rachel Wu, Mark Meiselbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace McCormackUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Rachel WuJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1695-8710
Mark MeiselbachJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3583-5588

Funding

Access to Mental Health Care Specialists in Medicare Advantage: Improving Outcomes for Older AdultsK01MH137322 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Meiselbach · 2024 to 2026
$546k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH137322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs) among individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid has more than tripled over the past decade. Little is known about whether D-SNP plan design differs from standard MA plan design nor whether this design reflects the needs of dual-eligible enrollees. We characterize the degree to which D-SNPs specialize in an important plan design dimension-provider networks. We find that in 2022, 46% of D-SNPs offer networks that are distinct from the insurer's standard MA plan networks. Compared with D-SNP networks that are shared with standard MA plans, specialized D-SNP networks include more psychiatrists, Ob/Gyn's, and neurologists, providers that specialize in treating conditions more common among dually eligible enrollees. Network specialization is more common among insurers participating in the local Medicaid market and less common in provider shortage areas, suggesting investment in Medicaid and reduced provider negotiation costs may facilitate specialization.

Indexed as

MedicaidMedicare Part CAgedEligibility DeterminationFemaleHumansSpecializationUnited StatesD-SNPsMedicaidMedicare Advantageprovider networks

Identifiers

PMID39560115
PMCPMC12043026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.