Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559880›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2024

Free Recall Outperforms Story Recall in Associations with Plasma Biomarkers in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease.

A J Aschenbrenner, J J Hassenstab, S E Schindler, S Janelidze, O Hansson, J C Morris, E Grober

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A J AschenbrennerAndrew Aschenbrenner, PhD, 4488 Forest Park Ave, STE 301, St. Louis, MO, 63108, a.aschenbrenner@wustl.edu, 314-273-1041.
J J Hassenstab
S E Schindler
S Janelidze
O Hansson
J C Morris
E Grober

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID M. HOLTZMAN · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
Prospective validation and implementation of high-performing blood biomarkers and digital cognitive tests for detection of Alzheimer's disease in specialist memory clinic and primary care settingsR01AG083740 · NIA · LUNDS UNIVERSITET · PI Sebastian Palmqvist · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA decline in episodic memory is one of the earliest cognitive characteristics of Alzheimer disease and memory tests are heavily featured in cognitive composite endpoints that are used to demonstrate treatment efficacy. Assessments of episodic memory can take many forms including free recall, associate learning, and paragraph or story recall. Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer disease are now widely available and will likely form the backbone of cohort enrichment strategies for future clinical trials. Thus, it is critical to evaluate which episodic memory measures are most sensitive to plasma markers of Alzheimer disease pathology.

objectivesTo compare the associations of common episodic memory tests with plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer disease.

designLongitudinal cohort study.

settingAcademic medical center in the midwestern United States.

participantsA total of 161 cognitively normal older adults with at least one plasma biomarker assessment and two or more annual clinical and cognitive assessments which included up to three different tests of episodic memory. MEASUREMENTS: Episodic memory performance using free recall, paired associates recall or paragraph recall. Plasma Aβ42, Aβ40, ptau217, and neurofilament light chain were measured.

resultsFree recall on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (FCSRT + IR) was substantially more sensitive to longitudinal cognitive change associated with abnormal baseline plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and ptau217 compared to other measures of episodic memory. A cognitive composite that included only free recall showed larger decline associated with baseline Aβ42/Aβ40 when compared to those that included paragraph recall. Differences in decline across composites were minimal when considering baseline ptau217 or NfL.

conclusionEpisodic memory is a critical domain to assess in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Methods of assessing memory are not equal and longitudinal change in free recall substantially outperformed both paired associates and paragraph recall. Clinical trial results will depend critically on the episodic memory test(s) that are chosen for a composite endpoint and free recall from the FCSRT + IR is an optimal memory measure to include rather than paired associates or paragraph recall.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersMemory, EpisodicMental Recalltau ProteinsAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeurofilament ProteinsNeuropsychological TestsPeptide FragmentsProdromal SymptomsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-40)amyloid beta-protein (1-42)Biomarkersneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAlzheimer diseasecognitioncomposite scoresEpisodic memoryplasma biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39559880
PMCPMC11573877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.