Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559854›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2024

Connectivity-Based Real-Time Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neurofeedback in Nicotine Users: Mechanistic and Clinical Effects of Regulating a Meta-Analytically Defined Target Network in a Double-Blind Controlled Trial.

Arezoo Taebi, Klaus Mathiak, Benjamin Becker, Greta Kristin Klug, Jana Zweerings

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Peer-guided movie neurofeedback to facilitate recovery in opioid use disorder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arezoo TaebiDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1520-2890
Klaus MathiakDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Benjamin BeckerState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Greta Kristin KlugDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jana ZweeringsDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-1054

Funding

International Research Training Group (IRTG 2150) "The Neuroscience of Modulating Aggression and Impulsivity in Psychopathology" of the German Research Foundation (DFG) 269953372/GRK2150START-Program of the Faculty of Medicine of the RWTH Aachen University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the fundamental questions in real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rt-fMRI NF) investigations is the definition of a suitable neural target for training. Previously, we applied a meta-analytical approach to define a network-level target for connectivity-based rt-fMRI NF in substance use disorders. The analysis yielded consistent connectivity alterations between the insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) as well as the dorsal striatum and the ACC. In the current investigation, we addressed the feasibility of regulating this network and its functional relevance using connectivity-based neurofeedback. In a double-blind, sham-controlled design, 60 nicotine users were randomly assigned to the experimental or sham control group for one NF training session. The preregistered primary outcome was defined as improved inhibitory control performance after regulation of the target network compared to sham control. Secondary outcomes were (1) neurofeedback-specific changes in functional connectivity of the target network; (2) changes in smoking behavior and impulsivity measures; and (3) changes in resting-state connectivity profiles. Our results indicated no differences in behavioral measures after receiving feedback from the target network compared to the sham feedback. Target network connectivity was increased during regulation blocks compared to rest blocks, however, the experimental and sham groups could regulate to a similar degree. Accordingly, the observed activation patterns may be related to the mental strategies used during regulation attempts irrespective of the group assignment. We discuss several crucial factors regarding the efficacy of a single-session connectivity-based neurofeedback for the target network. This includes high fluctuation in the connectivity values of the target network that may impact controllability of the signal. To our knowledge, this investigation is the first randomized, double-blind controlled real-time fMRI study in nicotine users. This raises the question of whether previously observed effects in nicotine users are specific to the neurofeedback signal or reflect more general self-regulation attempts.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeurofeedbackTobacco Use DisorderAdultConnectomeDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansImpulsive BehaviorInhibition, PsychologicalMaleNerve NetYoung Adultfunctional connectivityfunctional networkinhibitory controlneurofeedbacknicotine dependencereal‐time fMRI

Identifiers

PMID39559854
PMCPMC11574450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.