Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559828›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2024

Artificial Intelligence can Facilitate Application of Risk Stratification Algorithms to Bladder Cancer Patient Case Scenarios.

Max S Yudovich, Ahmad N Alzubaidi, Jay D Raman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max S YudovichPenn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-576X
Ahmad N AlzubaidiPenn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jay D RamanPenn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has previously been shown to accurately predict colon cancer screening intervals when provided with clinical data and context in the form of guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Methods: Thirty-six hypothetical patient scenarios related to NMIBC were created and submitted to GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 at two separate time points. First, both models were prompted to risk stratify patients without any additional context provided. Custom instructions were then provided as textual context using the written versions of the NMIBC NCCN Results: GPT-3.5 correctly risk stratified 68% (24.5 of 36) of scenarios without context, slightly increasing to 74% (26.5 of 36) with textual context. Using GPT-4, the model had accuracy of 83% (30 of 36) without context, reaching 100% (36 of 36) with textual context ( Conclusions: GPT-4 can accurately risk stratify patients with respect to NMIBC when provided with context containing guidelines. Overestimation of risk is more common than underestimation, and intermediate risk NMIBC is most likely to be incorrectly stratified. With further validation, GPT-4 can become a tool for risk stratification of NMIBC in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceguideline adherencenon-muscle invasive bladder neoplasmsrisk factorsurology

Identifiers

PMID39559828
PMCPMC11571244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.