ArticleInterventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)2024
Feasibility and Safety of the Distal Transradial Access for Noncardiac Intervention.
Article in Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Two Distal Radial Hemostatic Devices for Radial Artery Patency Post-TACE: A Randomized Trial.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Trial
- Visceral artery aneurysms: a literature review of etiology, natural history, diagnosis and treatment paradigms.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Distal transradial access through the anatomical snuffbox has been highlighted in recent research because it provides extremely low invasiveness. It has demonstrated its feasibility and safety for cardiac intervention. However, its characteristics for noncardiac intervention are not well known. This report aims to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of noncardiac intervention with distal transradial access, with identification of practical devices for procedures. Material and Method: This retrospective study was conducted from May 2021 to December 2021 with consecutive patients who underwent distal transradial access for noncardiac intervention. This study analyzed patient physical information, procedural details, technical success rates, and distal transradial access-associated complications. Result: Nine patients (7 females, 2 males) aged 48-69 years (median: 57) were enrolled in this study. This study assessed 11 noncardiac procedures, such as transarterial infusion chemotherapy for head and neck malignancies ( Conclusions: Results revealed that distal transradial access is feasible with commercially available catheters and is safe for various noncardiac interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.