ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Protein allosteric site identification using machine learning and per amino acid residue reported internal protein nanoenvironment descriptors.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking the Efflux Barrier: P-Glycoprotein and Emerging Strategies to Overcome Multidrug Resistance in Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- MPLID (Membrane Protein-Lipid Interaction Database): A Large-Scale Experimental Resource of Residue-Level Protein-Lipid Contacts.GigaScience · 2026Article
- STING-ExositeDB: An AI-assisted curated database of protein exosites for drug discovery.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Allosteric Activation through Coordinated Energy Landscape Reweighting and Information Flow.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- STINGAllo: a web server for high-throughput prediction of allosteric site-forming residues using internal protein nanoenvironment descriptors.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allosteric regulation plays a crucial role in modulating protein functions and represents a promising strategy in drug development, offering enhanced specificity and reduced toxicity compared to traditional active site inhibition. Existing computational methods for predicting allosteric sites on proteins often rely on static protein surface pocket features, normal mode analysis or extensive molecular dynamics simulations encompassing both the protein function modulator and the protein itself. In this study, we introduce an innovative methodology that employs a per amino acid residue classifier to distinguish allosteric site-forming residues (AFRs) from non-allosteric, or free residues (FRs). Our model, STINGAllo, exhibits robust performance, achieving Distance Center Center (DCC) success rate when all AFRs were predicted within pockets identified by FPocket, overall DCC, F1 score and a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 78 %, 60 %, 64 % and 64 % respectively. Furthermore, we identified key descriptors that characterize the internal protein nanoenvironment of AFRs, setting them apart from FRs. These descriptors include the sponge effect, distance to the protein centre of geometry (cg), hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic potentials, eccentricity, and graph bottleneck features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.