Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559776›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Protein allosteric site identification using machine learning and per amino acid residue reported internal protein nanoenvironment descriptors.

Folorunsho Bright Omage, José Augusto Salim, Ivan Mazoni, Inácio Henrique Yano, Luiz Borro, Jorge Enrique Hernández Gonzalez, Fabio Rogerio de Moraes, Poliana Fernanda Giachetto, Ljubica Tasic, Raghuvir Krishnaswamy Arni and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. STING-ExositeDB: An AI-assisted curated database of protein exosites for drug discovery.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Folorunsho Bright OmageComputational Biology Research Group, Embrapa Digital Agriculture, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Augusto SalimDepartment of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ivan MazoniComputational Biology Research Group, Embrapa Digital Agriculture, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Inácio Henrique YanoComputational Biology Research Group, Embrapa Digital Agriculture, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz BorroComputational Biology Research Group, Embrapa Digital Agriculture, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge Enrique Hernández GonzalezSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São José do Rio Preto.
Fabio Rogerio de MoraesSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São José do Rio Preto.
Poliana Fernanda GiachettoComputational Biology Research Group, Embrapa Digital Agriculture, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ljubica TasicBiological Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raghuvir Krishnaswamy ArniSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São José do Rio Preto.
Goran NeshichComputational Biology Research Group, Embrapa Digital Agriculture, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allosteric regulation plays a crucial role in modulating protein functions and represents a promising strategy in drug development, offering enhanced specificity and reduced toxicity compared to traditional active site inhibition. Existing computational methods for predicting allosteric sites on proteins often rely on static protein surface pocket features, normal mode analysis or extensive molecular dynamics simulations encompassing both the protein function modulator and the protein itself. In this study, we introduce an innovative methodology that employs a per amino acid residue classifier to distinguish allosteric site-forming residues (AFRs) from non-allosteric, or free residues (FRs). Our model, STINGAllo, exhibits robust performance, achieving Distance Center Center (DCC) success rate when all AFRs were predicted within pockets identified by FPocket, overall DCC, F1 score and a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 78 %, 60 %, 64 % and 64 % respectively. Furthermore, we identified key descriptors that characterize the internal protein nanoenvironment of AFRs, setting them apart from FRs. These descriptors include the sponge effect, distance to the protein centre of geometry (cg), hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic potentials, eccentricity, and graph bottleneck features.

Indexed as

Allosteric sitesComputational drug designDistance center centerInternal protein nanoenvironmentMachine learningProtein structure analysisSTING descriptors

Identifiers

PMID39559776
PMCPMC11570862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.