Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559758›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

A non-human primate combinatorial system for long-distance communication.

Quentin Gallot, Cassandre Depriester, Steven Moran, Klaus Zuberbühler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Quentin GallotInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Cassandre DepriesterInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Steven MoranInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Klaus ZuberbühlerInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex vocal systems are thought to evolve if individuals are regularly challenged by complex social decision-making, the social complexity hypothesis. We tested this idea on a West African forest non-human primate, the Olive colobus monkey, a highly cryptic species with very little social behavior and very small group sizes, factors unlikely to favor the evolution of complex communication. The species also has an unusual fission-fusion social system, with group members regularly spending considerable amounts of time with neighboring groups. As predicted by the social complexity hypothesis, we only found a very basic repertoire of two call types in this species, produced by both males and females. However, the calls were astonishingly loud, never uttered alone but in syntactically structured sequences assembled along a set of rules. We concluded that the Olive colobus monkeys have evolved a combinatorial system to interact with distant group members.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceBiological sciencesLinguisticsSocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID39559758
PMCPMC11570502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.