ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Feasibility of real-time compression frequency and compression depth assessment in CPR using a "machine-learning" artificial intelligence tool.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Chest Compression Depth, Rate, and Spring Resistance with "Quality CardioPulmonary Resuscitation" (QCPR) Scores in a Manikin Model.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Video Review of Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training - A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Revolutionizing Resuscitation Through Precision and Prediction - A Narrative Review.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Video assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-CPR) has demonstrated to be efficient in improving CPR quality and patient outcomes, as Emergency Medical Service (EMS) dispatchers can use the video stream of a caller for diagnostic purposes and give instructions in a CPR scenario. However, the new challenges faced by EMS dispatchers during video-guided CPR (V-CPR)-such as analyzing the video stream, providing feedback to the caller, and managing stress-demand innovative solutions. This study explores the feasibility of incorporating an open-source "machine-learning" tool (artificial intelligence - AI), to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy in correctly detecting the actual compression frequency and compression depth in video footage of a simulated CPR. Design: MediaPipe Pose Landmark Detection (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA), an open-source AI software using "machine-learning" models to detect human bodies in images and videos, was programmed to assess compression frequency an depth in nine videos, showing CPR on a resuscitation manikin. Compression frequency and depth were assessed from compression to compression with AI software and were compared to the manikin's internal software (QCPR, Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway). After testing for Gaussian distribution, means of non-gaussian data were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and the Bland Altman method. Main results: MediaPipe Pose Landmark Detection successfully identified and tracked the person performing CPR in all nine video sequences. There were high levels of agreement between compression frequencies derived from AI and manikin's software. However, the precision of compression depth showed major inaccuracies and was overall not accurate. Conclusions: This feasibility study demonstrates the potential of open-source "machine-learning" tools in providing real-time feedback on V-CPR video sequences. In this pilot study, an open-source landmark detection AI software was able to assess CPR compression frequency with high agreement to actual frequency derived from the CPR manikin. For compression depth, its performance was not accurate, suggesting the need for adjustment. Since the software used is currently not intended for medical use, further development is necessary before the technology can be evaluated in real CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.