ArticleCureus2024
Validation of the Arabic Version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Scale Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic Determinants of Diabetes Self-Care and Health Literacy Among Adults in Southern Riyadh.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Religious Coping and Diabetes Self-Care Behaviors Among Adults with Diabetes in Saudi Arabia: A Cross Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) scale is an extensively used instrument for assessing self-care behaviors in diabetic patients. This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the SDSCA scale in type 2 diabetes to ensure its reliability and applicability in an Arabic-speaking population.
methodA longitudinal study design was implemented, and initially, 239 participants were selected. The English version of the SDSCA scale was translated by experts using forward and backward translation, and the final version was approved by six expert panels. The final Arabic version was distributed among the type 2 diabetes patients. Psychometric evaluation was performed by the assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, while test-retest reliability was examined using interclass correlation coefficients and exploratory factor analysis.
resultsFrom 239 participants, 102 were type 2 diabetic patients. Overall, Cronbach's alpha was 0.72, with the minimum in specific diet (-0.10), while the highest was 0.93 in general diet and blood sugar testing. Meanwhile, moderate to good inter-item and item-to-scale correlations were observed. According to factor analysis, items 1, 2, and 3 loaded heavily on the first dimension; 7 and 8 on the second; 5 and 6 on the third; and 9 and 10 on the fourth item; however, item 4 showed a low factor loading of 0.37 on the third dimension, indicating that this item may not correlate well. The second phase of the factor analysis, except items 3 and 4, exhibits a strong factor structure and captures differences in self-monitoring activity. This strengthens the scale's validity and reliability as a measurement tool. Overall, test-retest reliability demonstrates the robust reliability of diet (general), exercise, and blood sugar.
conclusionThe Arabic version of the SDSCA scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing self-care activities in type 2 diabetes patients in Saudi Arabia, especially in general diet, exercise, and blood sugar testing; however, additional modifications are required to increase the reliability of specific diet domains. This validated scale can be successfully used in clinical and research settings to monitor and enhance the self-care behaviors of Arabic-speaking diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.