ArticleCureus2024
Robotic Anatomical Liver Resection for Segment 7 Lesions Utilizing Saline-Linked Cautery (SLiC) Method.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Anatomical hepatectomy for segment 7 (S7) lesions is technically challenging due to their restricted accessibility and close proximity to the right hepatic vein, and the robotic approach for this challenging situation is currently not supported by conclusive data. Methods We present our novel technique of robotic anatomical hepatectomy for S7 lesions utilizing the saline-linked cautery (SLiC) method. Between 2022 and 2023, 10 robotic S7 subsectionectomy or right posterior sectionectomy were performed and included in the current study. The historical control group included patients undergoing laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for S7 lesions between 2017 and 2021 (n=9). Surgical outcomes were compared between the groups to assess the efficacy and safety of our technical robotic approach for S7 lesions. Results There were no conversions to open liver resection, no cases of grade B or C post-hepatectomy liver failure, and no mortality in the whole cohort. Although no difference was found between the laparoscopic and robotic groups in the difficulty score, operative time, and rate of red blood cell transfusion, the robotic group had a significantly lesser amount of surgical blood loss (28mL vs. 280mL, p=0.005). Concerning postoperative complications, one patient had liver subcapsular hematoma in the robotic group, although neither bile leakage nor intraperitoneal abscess occurred in the whole cohort. Conclusions Although robotic right posterior sectionectomy and S7 subsectionectomy of the liver are technically demanding procedures, the intrahepatic Glissonean approach using the SLiC method is safe and feasible. It might be performed without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. Thus, the current approach can be considered as one of the preferred options for robotic anatomical hepatectomy for S7 lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.