ArticleCureus2024
Navigating Postpartum Venous Thromboembolism: A Case of Thrombophilia, Bleeding Complications, and Chronic Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ureterovaginal fistula after hysterectomy with double-J stent misplacement into the inferior vena cava: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a critical complication occurring in the postpartum period. The pathogenesis involves a hypercoagulable state induced by pregnancy-related physiological changes, venous stasis from reduced mobility and pelvic compression during delivery, and endothelial injury. Postpartum VTE is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, necessitating heightened clinical vigilance. Understanding the risk factors, implementing prophylactic measures, and ensuring timely intervention are paramount for improving maternal health outcomes related to venous embolic events. The presented case is a 37-year-old female with a complex medical history marked by recurrent thrombotic events and pregnancy complications. Despite various prophylactic and therapeutic interventions, her condition culminated in severe chronic venous obstruction (CVO) requiring advanced interventional treatment and stent-graft implantation. Her medical history began in 2012 with two spontaneous abortions, leading to the identification of genetic mutations, including a homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation. In 2016, she developed PE after receiving hormonal contraceptive therapy without antithrombotic prophylaxis. Subsequent pregnancy was closely monitored, yet she suffered severe complications, including a cesarean delivery complicated by preeclampsia and postoperative thrombocytopenia, leading to massive iliofemoral-popliteal DVT. Initial treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was replaced with apixaban following a recurrent thrombotic event. Despite optimal anticoagulation, the patient developed symptomatic inferior vena cava (IVC) syndrome in 2022, characterized by chronic IVC occlusion, acute thrombosis of the portal and inferior mesenteric veins, and extensive collateral venous networks. She underwent recanalization and stenting of the iliac veins and IVC. This was followed by a hysterectomy due to metrorrhagia, significantly improving her quality of life. In this case, the homozygous MTHFR mutation was associated with recurrent thrombotic events and pregnancy complications. Despite multiple guidelines advising against MTHFR testing for thrombosis evaluation, the patient's management was influenced by her genetic profile and clinical history. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown efficacy in treating VTE in patients with hereditary thrombophilia. The clinical case also highlights the complexity of anticoagulation management, particularly after venous stenting, where maintaining stent patency poses significant challenges. Venous stenting, especially in CVO, has demonstrated substantial benefits, as evidenced by the patient's marked symptom improvement post-procedure. The long-term efficacy of stenting, optimal anticoagulation strategies, and post-procedural therapy require further research. This case highlights the complexities of managing hereditary thrombophilia with recurrent thrombosis and the evolving role of venous stenting in treating CVO. Individualized anticoagulation and multidisciplinary care are essential, with further studies needed to refine treatment and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.