ArticleCureus2024
Barriers to Publishing Scholarship: A Study on Neurology Physician Residents and Fellows.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Scholarly activity by trainees is required for US-accredited graduate medical education (GME) programs. Several factors, including financial barriers to open access (OA) journals, may impact trainees' successful completion of scholarly activity, but little is known to what extent, particularly for neurology trainees. Method The authors implemented a cross-sectional, web-based 17-item survey of US-accredited neurology residency and fellowship programs during the 2022-2023 academic year. Participant responses for producing scholarly activity during GME were analyzed by mixed methods and examined by trainee motivation and perceived barriers, available institutional research support, and OA awareness and compared against socio-demographics (i.e., disadvantaged status history, underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status, international medical school graduate (IMG)) and prior research experience. Results Seventy-two respondents from 63 neurology programs completed the survey. Participants represented all US census regions and mostly from academic health centers and in advanced years of training. Overall, 17 (23.6%) self-reported as URiM and 20 (27.8%) as an IMG. Sixty-two (86.1%) were familiar with OA. Prior publications were associated with OA awareness (X
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.