Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559608›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Exploring the Link Between Early Technology Exposure and Developmental Milestones in Childhood.

Justin B Atkins, Samantha Difulvio, Jordana Boneh, Rebecca Myers, Caroline Tohic, Crystal Dickson, Diana Pena, Edward Simanton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justin B AtkinsCollege of Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.
Samantha DifulvioCollege of Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.
Jordana BonehPediatrics, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.
Rebecca MyersPediatrics, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.
Caroline TohicDiagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, USA.
Crystal DicksonPediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Diana PenaPediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Edward SimantonMedical Education, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This study examined the relationship between touchscreen exposure and developmental outcomes in early childhood using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3), a widely-used developmental screening tool. Methods During a well-child visit, parents of 51 children aged 18-36 months completed the ASQ-3 and a survey on their child's touchscreen habits (timing of introduction, daily usage duration, independent use, engagement in creative activities). Medical records were reviewed for developmental diagnoses and health conditions. Analysis One-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs) examined differences in ASQ-3 domain scores (problem-solving, personal-social, communication, gross motor, fine motor) based on the age of touchscreen introduction and average daily usage time. Independent t-tests compared scores between groups defined by independent touchscreen use and creative activity engagement. Effect sizes were calculated for significant differences. Results In the problem-solving domain, children introduced to touchscreens before 12 months of age scored significantly higher than those introduced later, with a statistical significance of p<0.05 and an effect size of d=0.45. However, there were no significant differences in scores based on the duration of daily touchscreen usage. In the personal-social domain, children introduced to touchscreens at 12 months or later scored significantly higher than those introduced before 12 months, with a significance of p<0.05 and an effect size of d=0.51. Moderate daily usage of 30-90 minutes was associated with higher scores compared to lower usage of less than 30 minutes or higher usage of more than 90 minutes (p<0.05). Additionally, children who used touchscreens independently had significantly higher scores, with a significance of p<0.01 and an effect size of d=0.76. Those who engaged in activities such as coloring or crafting also had significantly higher scores, with a significance of p<0.01 and an effect size of d=0.82. In other domains, such as communication, gross motor, and fine motor, no significant effects of touchscreen exposure were observed. Discussion Earlier touchscreen introduction may facilitate problem-solving skills like experimentation and cognitive flexibility through interactive digital play. However, excessive touchscreen use (greater than 90 minutes per day) before 12 months could interfere with pivotal social-emotional learning from real-world interactions, impeding personal-social development. Moderate, supervised touchscreen exposure combined with creative hands-on activities appears optimal for fostering strong personal-social competencies like cooperation and emotional understanding during the toddler years. Conclusion Timing, duration, context, and content of touchscreen experiences in early childhood relate differently to specific developmental domains. Guidelines should consider these nuances to support overall healthy child development in our digital world. Larger longitudinal studies using multi-method assessments are needed.

Indexed as

child behaviour and developmentchild developmentchild's screen timepediatric milestonesscreen-based simulationscreen exposure timescreen time

Identifiers

PMID39559608
PMCPMC11571286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.