ArticleCureus2024
Six-Port Robotic Liver Resection Using Double Bipolar Clamp-Crush Method With Saline Drops: Advancing Safety, Efficiency, and Versatility in Liver Parenchymal Dissection.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Updated overview of robotic hepatic parenchymal transection techniques: technical developments, international perspectives, and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Safety of robotic hepatic parenchymal transection using scissor hepatectomy and alternative techniques: a cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Evolution of Robotic-Assisted Hepatobiliary Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic liver resection (RLR) faces challenges in parenchymal dissection due to device limitations, necessitating the development of a safe, efficient, and versatile method for its widespread use. We introduce our six-port RLR approach utilizing the double bipolar clamp-crush method with saline drops to overcome these device limitations. This method, combined with robotic bipolar forceps, maximizes the advantages of RLR by leveraging its multi-joint functionality and facilitates the dissection of strong, fibrotic liver tissue through the use of bipolar energy. The assistant surgeon strategically drops saline solution from an electrocautery system onto the operative field, while simultaneously removing crushed tissue, blood, and excess moisture using an endoscopic suction system through two assistant trocars. This process prevents tissue adhesion to the forceps and carbonization while maintaining a moist environment. Hemostasis is achieved using bipolar or monopolar coagulation under these conditions, with multiple hemostatic devices ensuring safety. In our study, RLR was performed on 16 lesions in 13 patients, including two with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Median blood loss was 27 mL, and no postoperative complications occurred. The forceps were changed a median of four times due to tissue adherence during liver parenchymal dissection, which prevented tissue adhesion and facilitated efficient hepatic resection. Although further advances in instrumentation technology for RLR are needed, we are confident that our method will lower the barriers for many surgeons to adopt robotic liver resection and contribute to its further widespread use. Our six-port double bipolar clamp-crush method with saline drops shows promise for safe, efficient, and versatile liver parenchymal resection in current RLR practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.