ArticleCureus2024
Left-Right Differences in Oral Function and Quality of Life of Patients Who Underwent Tongue Resection.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Head and neck related quality of life following glossectomy among tongue cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Time-dependent changes in flap-site pain compared with overall surgical pain after oral cancer resection and reconstruction: a retrospective study.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of the effect of fentanyl dosage used in patient-controlled analgesia for pain management after oral cancer surgery: a retrospective observational study.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The tongue plays an important role in oral functions, including articulation, eating, and swallowing. The treatment of tongue cancer (TC) often leads to oral morbidities, such as limited mouth opening, dry mouth, swallowing difficulties, and mucositis. The anterior-posterior resection area of the tongue has a significant impact on oral function and quality of life (QOL). However, the specific left-right differences in oral function of patients who underwent tongue resection remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of left-right differences on oral function and QOL in patients with TC who underwent tongue resection. Methodology This study included 40 patients with TC who underwent surgical resection smaller than hemiglossectomy and were divided into left (LG) and right (RG) tongue groups. The oral, respiratory, and feeding functions and the QOL at baseline (before treatment) and one, three, and six months after treatment (1M, 3M, and 6M, respectively) were evaluated. Maximum tongue pressure and lip-closure force were used to evaluate the oral functions. Peak expiratory flow was used to evaluate the respiratory function. The Functional Oral Intake Scale was used to evaluate the feeding functions. The QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaires: QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35. Results The results indicated that there were no significant differences in oral, respiratory, or feeding function between the LG and RG groups at all evaluation periods. However, regarding QOL assessments, at 3M, LG indicated a significantly higher score than RG for swallowing (LG = 3.17, RG = 10.00, p = 0.037) and trouble with social eating (LG = 12.30, RG = 20.56, p = 0.025) in the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. At 6M, the LG also indicated a significantly higher QOL than RG for global health status (LG = 81.14, RG = 65.69, p = 0.018) and physical function (LG = 96.51, RG = 89.80, p = 0.047) in the EORTC QLQ-C30. Conclusions While the left-right differences in tongue function did not lead to functional impairment post-surgery, they significantly affected the QOL. The results indicate the importance of considering these differences in postoperative care to effectively address the QOL concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.