ReviewRSC advances2024
Advancements in biohydrogen production - a comprehensive review of technologies, lifecycle analysis, and future scope.
Review in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic pre‑treatment-driven dark fermentation of domestic organic waste for high‑yield biohydrogen production.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Waste-to-energy approach by transforming municipal solid waste into biohydrogen and biomethane through dark fermentation with the yield of biofertilizer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of voltage application on hydrogen production performance and stabilization in an electro-supported dynamic membrane bioreactor.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Advances in AI-Driven Biomass Processing: A Review of Conversion Technologies, Optimization Strategies, and Smart Energy Integration.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Biological Routes for Biohydrogen Production: A Clean and Carbon-Free Fuel.Biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global shift towards sustainable energy sources, necessitated by climate change concerns, has led to a critical review of biohydrogen production (BHP) processes and their potential as a solution to environmental challenges. This review evaluates the efficiency of various reactors used in BHP, focusing on operational parameters such as substrate type, pH, temperature, hydraulic retention time (HRT), and organic loading rate (OLR). The highest yield reported in batch, continuous, and membrane reactors was in the range of 29-40 L H
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.