ReviewUS cardiology2023
Sex and Gender Differences in Aortic Disease.
Review in US cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Dysbiosis, Sex, and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Sex impacts outcome in minimally invasive surgery of the ascending aorta: a propensity score matched analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Ascending Aortic Aneurysms: From Pathophysiology to Surgical Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Olfactory Receptors and Aortic Aneurysm: Review of Disease Pathways.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Aging Two-Step: SOX9's Influence on Vascular Stiffness and Senescence.Circulation research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dilatation of the thoracic or abdominal aorta can progress to dissection or rupture with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Aortic disease remains a treatable contributor to mortality in the US and its burden is likely underestimated. Recent clinical studies have uncovered sex and gender distinctions in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and outcomes of aortic disease. Despite this, there has been little progress in the application of these findings to clinical practice. Improved understanding of the sex-specific mechanisms of aortic disease may inform personalized indications for elective repair and thus reduce the morbidity of aortic catastrophe. The objective of this review is to summarize known clinical and biological sex differences in both thoracic and abdominal aortic disease and highlight promising areas for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.