ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
Clinical decision-making in bone cancer care management and forecast of ICU needs based on computed tomography.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging Nanocarrier Strategies for Optimized Drug Delivery in the Treatment of Primary Bone Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT) imaging in the diagnosis and management of bone cancer during periods of limited access to histopathological testing. We aimed to determine the correlation between CT severity levels and subsequent patient management and care decisions, adhering to established oncological CT reporting guidelines. Methodology: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 symptomatic patients from January 2021 to January 2024. The cohort included patients aged between 50 and 86 years, with a mean age of 68 years, and 75 % were male. All patients had their bone cancer diagnosis confirmed through histopathological examination, and CT imaging was used as the reference method. The analysis involved assessing the correlation between CT severity scores and patient management, including ICU admissions. Results: The study found that CT imaging demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.6% in diagnosing bone cancer, with accuracy increasing to 97.6% in cases with high-probability CT characteristics. CT specificity also showed a consistent rise. Osteolytic lesions were the predominant finding, detected in 85.9% of cases. Among these, 88% exhibited engagement across multiple skeletal regions, 92.8% showed bilateral distribution, and 92.8% presented with peripheral involvement. In ICU patients, bone consolidation was observed in 81.5% of cases and was predominant in 66.7% of the ICU cohort. Additionally, ICU patients had significantly higher CT severity scores, with scores exceeding 14 being notably prevalent. Conclusions: During the management period of bone cancer at our hospital, characteristic features on CT imaging facilitated swift and sensitive investigation. Two distinct CT phenotypes, associated with the primary osteolytic phenotype and severity score, emerged as valuable indicators for assessing the severity of the disease, particularly during ICU care. These findings highlight the diverse manifestations and severity levels encountered in bone cancer patients and underscore the importance of CT imaging in their diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.