ArticleBiomaterials research2024
A Flexible Membrane May Improve Bone Regeneration by Increasing Hydrophilicity and Conformability in Lateral Bone Augmentation.
Article in Biomaterials research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do collagen membranes with different thickness-related mechanical properties affect the outcomes of lateral bone augmentation? An immunohistochemical analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Development of molecularly imprinted vegetarian membranes (MIP-VMs) for oral tissue repair and regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Colloidal Crystal Hydrogel Crown Fused with Machine Learning-Integrated Resistance Strain Sensor for Pressure Sensing.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Bone regeneration and biosorption patterns of different bone substitutes: anJournal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collagen membranes play a crucial role in guided bone regeneration (GBR) by preventing soft tissue infiltration and maintaining space for bone formation. This study investigated the impact of collagen membrane flexibility on GBR outcomes through in vitro and in vivo analyses. Flexible (0.3 mm in width) and stiff (0.5 mm in width) porcine collagen membranes were compared. In vitro tests assessed hydrophilicity, enzymatic degradation, conformability, space maintenance, and tensile strength. An in vivo study using a canine model evaluated bone regeneration in standardized mandibular defects filled with deproteinized porcine bone mineral and covered with no membrane, flexible membrane, or stiff membrane. Micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analyses were performed at 8 and 16 weeks. The flexible membrane demonstrated superior hydrophilicity, faster enzymatic degradation, and greater conformability in vitro. In vivo, micro-computed tomography analysis revealed similar alveolar ridge widths across all groups. Histomorphometric analysis at 16 weeks showed significantly larger regenerated areas in the flexible membrane group compared to controls in coronal, middle, and apical regions. Both membrane groups exhibited higher regeneration ratios than controls, with significant differences in the coronal area. The flexible membrane group demonstrated significantly higher new bone formation in all regions compared to controls at 16 weeks. These findings suggest that flexible membrane substantially enhances GBR outcomes by increasing hydrophilicity and conformability. The study highlights the potential clinical benefits of incorporating flexible membranes in GBR procedures for improved bone regeneration outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.