Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559482›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024

Perspectives on Treatment Decisions, Preferences, and Adherence and Long-Term Management in Asthma and COPD: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient, Caregiver, and Healthcare Provider Insights.

Miguel Román-Rodríguez, Ilona McMullan, Michelle Warner, Christopher H Compton, Ruth Tal-Singer, Jean M Orlow, MeiLan K Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miguel Román-RodríguezCentro de Salud Dra. Teresa Pique, Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9155-1411
Ilona McMullanGSK, London, UK.
Michelle WarnerGSK, London, UK.
Christopher H ComptonGSK, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7564-5343
Ruth Tal-SingerGlobal Allergy and Airways Patient Platform, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5275-8062
Jean M OrlowCOPD Patient and COPD Foundation Community Member, Miami, FL, USA.
MeiLan K HanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This analysis assessed patient, caregiver, and healthcare provider (HCP) opinions regarding asthma and COPD diagnosis and treatment, including inhaler device preferences. Patients and Methods: Insights were from: (1) face-to-face/telephone patient/HCP communications with GSK Global Medical Teams; (2) social media listening; (3) a self-completed online patient/caregiver survey. Data were anonymized and informed consent was provided. Qualitative outputs were extracted, analyzed inductively, and coded per key themes, such as treatment preferences (including perceptions of single inhaler triple therapy [SITT] versus multiple inhaler triple therapy [MITT]) and long-term treatment goals. Data could be assigned to ≥1 theme. Results: Overall, 2966 patient and HCP insights (patients, 1150; HCPs, 1816), 988 social media posts, and 44 survey responses (patients, 33; caregivers, 11) were included. Within this analysis, some patients delayed seeking medical advice due to lack of disease understanding and used alternative information sources to better understand treatment options (eg, social media). Patients preferred SITT over MITT in terms of convenience, ease of use, and perceived efficacy; some believed that MITT provided greater coverage due to frequent dosing. HCPs recognized the tendency of patient preferences to drive treatment decisions, and highlighted a reluctance to change therapy among some patients, particularly those well controlled in current therapy. Patients preferred therapies with a shorter onset of action. Patients tended to measure treatment success by symptom improvement and quality of life, whereas HCPs measured treatment success through clinical tests. HCPs reported a lack of patient awareness of the mortality risk associated with COPD. Conclusion: There is discordance between patient and HCP perceptions of treatment success and goals in asthma and COPD. Improved patient education and HCP-patient communication are needed to facilitate meaningful shared decision-making, optimize care plans, and provide early treatment options.

Indexed as

medical advicemultiple inhaler triple therapypatient educationquality of lifesingle inhaler triple therapytreatment goals

Identifiers

PMID39559482
PMCPMC11571923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.