Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559428›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2024

Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study.

Philipp Feodorovici, Nils Sommer, Philipp Bergedieck, Philipp Lingohr, Jörg C Kalff, Joachim Schmidt, Jan C Arensmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integration of high-resolution mixed reality models into resident training.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp FeodoroviciDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Nils SommerDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Philipp BergedieckDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Philipp LingohrDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Joachim SchmidtDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Jan C ArensmeyerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In medical education various non-digital teaching methods are established. However, studies have proven that the immersive character of virtual reality (VR) applications positively impact the understanding of spatial relationships.This study outlines the development and pilot testing of a novel system for collaborative, case-based VR teaching, utilizing real-time volume rendered computed tomography (CT) data of thoracic cases among graduate students. Methods: A system was configured and deployed to provide real-time volume rendered CT data in a collaborative, multiuser VR environment. A thoracic surgery VR course was implemented into the surgical graduate curriculum, which has subsequently been evaluated with questionnaires. Results: Seventy students assessed the curriculum through a questionnaire. Usability was rated intuitive (77.14 %) while few students (5.71 %) reported cyber sickness.A vast majority (98.57 %) agreed VR improved their understanding of anatomy compared to traditional methods and most students found learning more effective. (88.57 %) and joy during participation was rated high (97,14 %). A majority of the students (61.43 %) believed VR could partly replace traditional methods. They supported integrating VR into preclinical (81.43 %) and clinical teaching (94.29 %) as well as taking VR courses from home (78.57 %). Most participants (90,72 %) encouraged the expansion of VR infrastructure. Conclusion: The concept of a collaborative real-time VR-based educational program in medical graduate teaching has proven its technical feasibility and positive acceptance with a desire for more VR integration in surgical curricula. A two-armed study will be conducted to evaluate the objective impact as the expansion of VR environments for teaching continues.

Indexed as

Case-based teachingCollaborative virtual realityExtended realityGraduate educationThoracic surgeryVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39559428
PMCPMC11570854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.