Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559405›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2024

Setting up of a sensory panel for the analysis of water (SUSPAW).

Garazi de la Fuente Aldazabal, Iñaki Etaio Alonso, Maria Del Pilar Fernández Gil, Mónica Ojeda Atxiaga, Wendy Alicia Rivera Ramos, Francisco José Pérez-Elortondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Garazi de la Fuente AldazabalLaboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (LASEHU). Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). Lascaray Ikergunea, Miguel de Unamuno hiribidea 3, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain.
Iñaki Etaio AlonsoLaboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (LASEHU). Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). Lascaray Ikergunea, Miguel de Unamuno hiribidea 3, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain.
Maria Del Pilar Fernández GilLaboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (LASEHU). Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). Lascaray Ikergunea, Miguel de Unamuno hiribidea 3, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain.
Mónica Ojeda AtxiagaLaboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (LASEHU). Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). Lascaray Ikergunea, Miguel de Unamuno hiribidea 3, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain.
Wendy Alicia Rivera RamosLaboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (LASEHU). Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). Lascaray Ikergunea, Miguel de Unamuno hiribidea 3, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain.
Francisco José Pérez-ElortondoLaboratorio de Análisis Sensorial Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (LASEHU). Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU). Lascaray Ikergunea, Miguel de Unamuno hiribidea 3, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legislation on the quality of water intended for human consumption requires routine taste and odour controls. So far, no procedures or technical documents exist which can be used as a reference in the training of sensory assessors for tap water. This work presents the procedure for the development of a trained panel and it describes all the steps carried out: the recruitment, pre-selection, selection and training phase considering the different odours and flavours that tap water may contain. In order to analyse the performance of the assessors in the training phase, 6 parameters and 15 criteria are proposed. The assessors who fulfilled the criteria

Indexed as

Chemical referencesDrinking waterPanel trainingQuality controlSensory assessorSensory thresholds

Identifiers

PMID39559405
PMCPMC11570730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.