Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Integrating large language models in mental health practice: a qualitative descriptive study based on expert interviews.

Yingzhuo Ma, Yi Zeng, Tong Liu, Ruoshan Sun, Mingzhao Xiao, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yingzhuo Ma *Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yi Zeng *Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Tong LiuDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ruoshan SunDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Mingzhao XiaoDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Progress in developing artificial intelligence (AI) products represented by large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's ChatGPT has sparked enthusiasm for their potential use in mental health practice. However, the perspectives on the integration of LLMs within mental health practice remain an underreported topic. Therefore, this study aimed to explore how mental health and AI experts conceptualize LLMs and perceive the use of integrating LLMs into mental health practice. Method: In February-April 2024, online semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 experts (12 psychiatrists, 7 mental health nurses, 2 researchers in medical artificial intelligence) from four provinces in China, using snowballing and purposive selection sampling. Respondents' discussions about their perspectives and expectations of integrating LLMs in mental health were analyzed with conventional content analysis. Results: Four themes and eleven sub-themes emerged from this study. Firstly, participants discussed the (1) practice and application reform brought by LLMs into mental health (fair access to mental health services, enhancement of patient participation, improvement in work efficiency and quality), and then analyzed the (2) technological-mental health gap (misleading information, lack of professional nuance and depth, user risk). Based on these points, they provided a range of (3) prerequisites for the integration of LLMs in mental health (training and competence, guidelines for use and management, patient engagement and transparency) and expressed their (4) expectations for future developments (reasonable allocation of workload, upgrades and revamps of LLMs). Conclusion: These findings provide valuable insights into integrating LLMs within mental health practice, offering critical guidance for institutions to effectively implement, manage, and optimize these tools, thereby enhancing the quality and accessibility of mental health services.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsAdultEfficiency, OrganizationalFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedResearch PersonnelChatGPTlarge language modelmental healthpublic healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID39559378
PMCPMC11571062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.