ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Assessing sepsis-induced immunosuppression to predict positive blood cultures.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of a Host-Response Point-of-Care Assay for Early Sepsis Diagnosis in UK Emergency Departments.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Article
- Early Identification of a Cytokine-Low Immune Phenotype in Suspected Sepsis Using a Point-of-Care Whole-Blood TNF-α Release Assay.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structural diversity of lipid A modulates neutrophil proteome and secretome responses.Journal of proteomics · 2026Article
- Point-of-care LPS-induced TNF-α release testing for early sepsis risk stratification in the emergency department.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Sepsis: Immune Trajectories, Monocyte Dysfunction, and Translational Biomarkers.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Predicting Gram-negative bloodstream infection in elderly patients after isolation of GNB from non-blood specimens: a machine learning-based tool.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- When to initiate immunomodulatory therapy in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From sepsis biomarker discovery to regulatedFrontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- New developments in the role of ferroptosis in sepsis‑induced cardiomyopathy (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bacteremia is a life-threatening condition that can progress to sepsis and septic shock, leading to significant mortality in the emergency department (ED). The standard diagnostic method, blood culture, is time-consuming and prone to false positives and false negatives. Although not widely accepted, several clinical and artificial intelligence-based algorithms have been recently developed to predict bacteremia. However, these strategies require further identification of new variables to improve their diagnostic accuracy. This study proposes a novel strategy to predict positive blood cultures by assessing sepsis-induced immunosuppression status through endotoxin tolerance assessment. Methods: Optimal assay conditions have been explored and tested in sepsis-suspected patients meeting the Sepsis-3 criteria. Blood samples were collected at ED admission, and endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) challenge was performed to evaluate the innate immune response through cytokine profiling. Results: Clinical variables, immune cell population biomarkers, and cytokine levels (tumor necrosis factor [TNFα], IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) were measured. Patients with positive blood cultures exhibited significantly lower TNFα production after LPS challenge than did those with negative blood cultures. The study also included a validation cohort to confirm that the response was consistent. Discussion: The results of this study highlight the innate immune system immunosuppression state as a critical parameter for sepsis diagnosis. Notably, the present study identified a reduction in monocyte populations and specific cytokine profiles as potential predictive markers. This study showed that the LPS challenge can be used to effectively distinguish between patients with bloodstream infection leading to sepsis and those whose blood cultures are negative, providinga rapid and reliable diagnostic tool to predict positive blood cultures. The potential applicability of these findings could enhance clinical practice in terms of the accuracy and promptness of sepsis diagnosis in the ED, improving patient outcomes through timely and appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.