ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
The Value of Common Laboratory Markers in Predicting the Severity of COVID-19 Patients.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to identify more effective laboratory markers to assess the severity of corona virus disease 2019 and predict the progression of the disease by collecting more laboratory markers and variables. Patients and Methods: In this study, most risk factors, including epidemiological characteristics, blood cell counts, cytokines, and infection markers, were collected from 126 patients with COVID-19 to assess their predictive value. Results: The area under curve (AUC) of Albumin (Alb) to fibrinogen (Fib) ratio (AFR) (0.791), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (0.792), myoglobin (MYO) (0.795), C-reactive protein (CRP) (0.801) and lymphocyte count (0.859) were higher than other markers to distinguish severe from non-severe patients in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, thirty-six out of 46 risk factors, including 34 laboratory markers, were significantly associated with increased odds of severe patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the CD19+ lymphocyte count, MYO, LDH, and AFR were associated with increased odds of severe disease. Moreover, Lymphocyte count and AFR levels increased, LDH and CRP levels decreased during hospitalization in recovered severe patients, whereas severe lymphocytopenia and continuously increasing LDH levels were observed in deteriorated patients. AFR level increased and CRP level decreased before the disease worsened in the deteriorated patients; however, when the patients deteriorated, AFR decreased and CRP increased significantly. Conclusion: CD19+ lymphocyte count, MYO, LDH, and AFR are independent biomarkers for early identification of severe COVID-19. Lymphocyte count, AFR, LDH, and CRP levels were helpful in predicting the clinical progression of the disease.\.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.