Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559336›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Phylogenetic relationships of Neogene hamsters (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetinae) revealed under Bayesian inference and maximum parsimony.

Moritz Dirnberger, Pablo Peláez-Campomanes, Raquel López-Antoñanzas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moritz DirnbergerISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2844-3554
Pablo Peláez-CampomanesDepartamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6551-1026
Raquel López-AntoñanzasISEM, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-0476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the internal systematics of today's group of hamsters (Cricetinae), following new insights that are gained based on molecular data. Regarding the closely related fossil cricetids, however, most studies deal with only a limited number of genera and statements about their possible relationships are rare. In this study, 41 fossil species from the Late Miocene to the Pliocene, belonging to seven extinct cricetine genera,

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremFossilsPhylogenyAnimalsCricetinaeAncestral state reconstructionBayesian inferenceCricetinaeMaximum parsimonyMorphological clockNeogeneRodentiaRogue taxaStratigraphic congruenceTip-dating

Identifiers

PMID39559336
PMCPMC11572387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.