ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Bibliometric analysis of microphthalmos and anophthalmos over 20 years: from 2004 to 2023.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A bibliometric and visualized analysis of choriocapillaris from 2013 to 2023.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo conduct a bibliometric analysis of studies on microphthalmos and anophthalmos (M/A), explore research hotspots, and provide information on future research interests in this field to benefit clinicians and researchers.
methodsTotally 751 publications related to M/A from the year 2004 to 2023 were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection database. These publications consist of both original and review articles, that are composed in English. The contributions of different countries, institutions, journals, and authors were analyzed, and network analysis was conducted by using Microsoft Excel 2021, VOSviewer, and R Studio to visualize research hotspots.
resultsAmong all publications included, the highest number of publications came from USA (218, 29.03%). China followed with 99 publications (13.18%), and England with 86 publications (11.45%). The publications from the USA had the highest frequency of citations, with 16 699 citations, and the highest H-index of 49. The
conclusionData have been gathered on the yearly count of published materials and citations, as well as the rise in publication trends, the efficiency of regions or countries, authors, journals, and organizations, along with the high-cited publications in M/A. The recent trend of research has shifted from genetic mechanisms to different clinical phenotypes and corresponding clinical interventions, which can give direction to future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.