ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Relative peripheral refractive errors in Chinese children with myopic anisometropia.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Changing Natural History of Anisometropia: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of relative peripheral refraction in children with different refractive statuses and its associations with ocular biometry.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative effects of orthokeratology and defocus incorporated multiple segment lenses on axial length elongation in children with bilateral myopic anisometropia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Interocular differences in choroidal thickness and circulation in anisomyopic adults and their association with myopia severity.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare relative peripheral refractive errors (RPREs) in Chinese children with and without myopic anisometropia (MAI) and to explore the relationship between RPRE and myopia.
methodsThis observational cross-sectional study included 160 children divided into two groups according to the interocular spherical equivalent refraction (SER) difference ≥1.0 D in the MAI group (
resultsIn the non-MAI group, the interocular differences of all parameters of RPRE were not significant. In the MAI group, the interocular differences of TRDV, RDV10-53, RDV-S, RDV-I, RDV-T, and RDV-N were significant. In subgroup analysis, the interocular differences of TRDV, RDV30-53, RDV-I, and RDV-T were significant in ∆SER<2.0 D group and ∆SER≥2.0 D group, but the interocular differences of RDV10-30, RDV-S and RDV-N were only significant in the ∆SER≥2.0 D group. In correlation analysis, ∆TRDV, ∆RDV 10-53, ∆RDV-S, and ∆RDV-N were negatively correlated with ∆SER but positively correlated with ∆AL.
conclusionThe more myopic eyes have larger hyperopic RPRE in Chinese children with MAI in certain retinal range, and partial ∆RPRE is closely associated with ∆SER and ∆AL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.