ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Short-term fluctuation of intraocular pressure and influencing factors following intravitreal injection in patients with retinal vascular diseases.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early combined conbercept and dexamethasone implant therapy for diabetic macular edema.International ophthalmology · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the patterns of short-term intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations and identify the contributing factors following intravitreal injection in patients with retinal vascular diseases.
methodsTotally 81 patients were enrolled in this case control study. Eyes were categorized into 7 groups, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (CNV), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), diabetic macular edema (DME), macular edema secondary to branch (BVOME) and central (CVOME) retinal vein occlusion. IOP was measured in all patients using rebound tonometer at 7 preset time points perioperatively. Additionally, based on the administered medication, the eyes were classified into three treatment groups, including dexamethasone intravitreal implant (IVO), intravitreal conbercept (IVC), and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR). To compare IOP values at various time points across groups, we employed one-way ANOVA, independent sample
resultsPeak IOP values across all groups were observed at 40s, and 5min after intravitreal injection. Statistical differences in IOP were detected at the 5min among the 7 indication groups (
conclusionNeedle size plays a crucial role in the transient changes of IOP following intravitreal injection. Before administering intravitreal injection to patients with central retinal vein occlusion, it is essential to exclude any underlysing causes of increased IOP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.