Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559279›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2024

25 years into research with the Méhes Scale, a comprehensive scale of modern dysmorphology.

Dalma Tényi, Györgyi Csábi, József Janszky, Róbert Herold, Tamás Tényi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dalma TényiDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Györgyi CsábiDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical School, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
József JanszkyDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Róbert HeroldDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical School, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Tamás TényiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical School, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been recognized that subtle, cosmetically insignificant anomalies tend to occur cumulatively in diseases with neurodevelopmental origin. These visible signs of morphogenesis errors are called minor physical anomalies (MPAs), serving as sensitive external markers of abnormal neurodevelopment. After the introduction of the Waldrop Scale, the studies conducted on MPAs in diseases with neurodevelopmental origin gave conflicting results. It has been debated that this discrepancy can be - at least partly - attributed to the use of the Waldrop Scale. Understanding the need of a comprehensive scale of MPAs that also differentiates according to the time of development, Hungarian pediatrician professor of University of Pécs, Károly Méhes developed a scale with 57 items, the only scale differentiating minor malformations from phenogenetic variants. With the use of the Méhes Scale, our research group has been investigating the role of abnormal neurodevelopment in different neuropsychiatric and neurologic disorders since 1997. 25 years into our research, in this review we summarize the results of our 18 research articles on MPAs in different diseases. We have found an increased number of MPAs, especially in the head and mouth region, in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Tourette syndrome, autism and many epilepsy syndromes, fortifying the role of abnormal neurodevelopment in these diseases. Moreover, an increased number of MPAs was detected among the first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder, supporting the hypothesis about MPAs being endophenotypic trait markers.

Indexed as

epilepsyMéhes Scaleminor physical anomaliesneurodevelopmental disordersschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39559279
PMCPMC11570577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.