ArticleAJOG global reports2024
Uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding stratified by race in a commercial and Medicaid database.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Utilization after Uterine Fibroid Diagnosis by Race and Ethnicity.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2026Article
- Bone mineral density with elagolix plus add-back therapy in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids: open-label and post-treatment results of a 60-month phase 3 trial.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Historically, the clinical characteristics and treatment pathways for patients with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding have differed between White and Black women. Objective: To provide a contemporary comparison of patient characteristics and treatment patterns among White and Black women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding in the United States. Study Design: This retrospective cohort study included administrative claims data from 46,139 White and 17,297 Black women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding from the Optum Clinformatics database (January 2011-December 2020) and 7353 White and 16,776 Black women from the IBM MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Insurance database (January 2010-December 2019). Patients were indexed at their initial uterine fibroid diagnosis claim and were required to have a claim for heavy menstrual bleeding and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and postindex. Patients were followed until the earliest of death, disenrollment, hysterectomy date, or end of study database. Outcomes were stratified by race and included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, pharmacologic treatment patterns, and surgeries/procedures. Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous data were used to evaluate differences in baseline characteristics. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize treatment pathways for hormonal contraceptive use in women with ≥24 months of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate time until hysterectomy, with log-rank testing to assess between-group differences. Results: The mean (standard deviation) duration of follow-up was 44.6 (27.9) and 41.0 (24.9) months in the commercial and Medicaid databases, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) age at uterine fibroid diagnosis was lower for Black than White women in both databases (commercial: 42.3 [6.5] vs 44.4 [6.3] years; Conclusions: Black women with UF-HMB were diagnosed at a younger age than White women, and White women had higher hysterectomy rates than Black women, representing a shift from earlier researched treatment patterns. Patients with UF-HMB were also highly reliant on hormonal contraceptives, followed by nearly universal therapeutic discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.